Sign In
  • INDIA
  • GUJARAT
The Prime News Network
  • Home
  • Top Story
  • Science
  • Politics
  • Market
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Jobbs
  • Search
Reading: Thane Creek Bridge Project: TISS Assessing Damage to Fishermen
Share
The Prime News NetworkThe Prime News Network
Font ResizerAa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.

Home » Thane Creek Bridge Project: TISS Assessing Damage to Fishermen

Top Story

Thane Creek Bridge Project: TISS Assessing Damage to Fishermen

THE PRIME NEWS NETWORK
Last updated: May 16, 2025 4:06 am
THE PRIME NEWS NETWORK
Share
NDA Government Allegedly Uses SIT as Political Tool in Liquor Case, YSRCP Leader Charges
SHARE

Bombay High Court Orders TISS to Assess Damage and Compensation for Fishing Community Affected by Thane Creek Bridge III

To address the concerns of the fishing community, the Bombay High Court has appointed the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) to study the damage and loss caused by the Thane Creek Bridge III (TCB III) project and quantify the compensation for affected fishermen. This decision was made in a May 2, 2025, order made available on Thursday.

The Division Bench of judges, Justice B. P. Colabawalla and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, directed TISS to prepare a detailed report on the extent of damage and loss to the Project Affected Fishermen of TCB III and to recommend an amount towards the quantum of compensation payable to them. TISS may recommend a range of compensation, with the amount varying across different categories of Project Affected Fishermen, as determined by TISS. The costs incurred by TISS will be borne by Respondent No.8 (Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation).

TISS is required to submit the report by November 21, 2025, and the matter is listed for further directions on November 28, 2025.

The bench observed that there has been a clear determination that TCB III will have an impact on the livelihood of the Project Affected Fishermen. The purpose of the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) report or any other expert agency was to determine the extent of loss.

The damage caused cannot be determined with complete exactitude. "The nature of the exercise is by definition an estimation. Nevertheless, an attempt must be made to determine damage and loss by an expert looking at all relevant factors and date," the judges said.

The petition was filed on March 24, 2021, by Mariyayi Machhimaar Sahakari Sanstha, a society comprising members from the Koli community. The petition was filed in the wake of a public infrastructure project undertaken by the Maharashtra government in Thane Creek, near Vashi, Maharashtra, Bridge III Project ("TCB III").

TCB III was proposed as a six-lane bridge on the Sion-Panvel Highway. The project is largely complete; a portion of it is now open to vehicular traffic and will be fully operational in the coming weeks.

The fishermen affected by TCB III are inhabitants of Thane Creek and exercise their customary right to fish for a living in Thane Creek. They argue that construction of TCB III will adversely affect their customary right to fish, their only source of livelihood.

On June 22, 2021, the court appointed senior advocate Sharan Jagtiani as Amicus Curiae to assist the court in the case. On August 12, 2021, the HC cleared the way for the construction of the bridge but held that the project would impact the customary right of the fisherfolk living around the creek to fish.

On February 16, 2022, the court observed that despite six months passing, the Project Affected Fishermen had not been provided with any compensation. The CMFRI was directed to submit an Interim Report to the Court and to update the Court on the quantum of interim compensation that could be paid to the Project Affected Fishermen.

On March 23, 2022, the court directed an interim compensation of ₹ 10 crore to be paid to the over 900 fishermen families who were affected due to the construction of the third Thane creek bridge near Vashi. Each family was paid ₹ 1 lakh.

The issue of the final compensation amount to be paid to each of the affected families was pending.

In its final report submitted to the HC in 2023, the CMFRI said that the bridge had impacted fishing in the area. However, the report failed to quantify the loss suffered by the fisherfolk community.

"The ‘Compensation Policy and its Implementation Plan for Project Affected Fisherfolk of Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South)’ dated February 2023 prepared by TISS, which was brought to our attention by the Ld. Amicus Curiae, is a document that goes into great detail to provide a proper and comprehensive recommended Compensation for fisherfolk affected by that project, so that the affected fishermen are adequately supported for overcoming the impact of the project on their lives and livelihoods. That study was conducted after construction of the Coastal Road was well under way, and despite this, TISS was able to deploy a methodology by which it could reasonably assess damage and compensation. A similar effort should be made by TISS in the present case," the order said.

Senior advocate Milind Sathe, appearing for the MSRDC, said there was no infirmity with the CMFRI’s final report and claimed that no damage was caused to the fisherfolk. Hence, no further compensation is required to be paid.


Published – May 16, 2025 09:36 am IST

Reference

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Share This Article
Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Odisha BJP Education Quota Move Weakened BJD's Social Justice Efforts Odisha BJP Education Quota Move Weakened BJD’s Social Justice Efforts
Next Article Indian Stock Market Opens Lower Amid Mixed Global Cues Indian Stock Market Opens Lower Amid Mixed Global Cues
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

Top Story

"Director Honey Trehan Fights Back: Diljit Dosanjh’s Punjab ’95 Faces 127 Cuts, CBFC Questions Logic"

Okay, let's tackle this request. The user wants me to rewrite the given article without changing the meaning, make it…

14 Min Read

Update on Access Permission Denial: Explore Security How-Tos for Your Workers

Access Denied Error on Website Reference: 18.2ef63717.1749569546.5bfe035 URL: https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.2ef63717.1749569546.5bfe035 Error Description: You don't have permission to access the requested page…

0 Min Read
Top Story

Okay, let’s tackle this title rewrite. The original is “Bitcoin’s creator is now richer than Dell CEO, but nobody’s ever seen them.” The user wants it in News Style and SEO-focused. First, SEO keywords: “Bitcoin creator,” “Jack Dorsey,” “Dell CEO,” maybe “Michael Dell,” but the original mentions “nobody’s ever seen them” so maybe “Unknown Bitcoin Creator” is better. Need to include terms people might search for. News style requires attention-grabbing. Maybe use a colon to separate the hook from the details. Also, numbers or superlatives can help. “Richer than Dell CEO” could be phrased as “Surpasses Dell CEO’s Fortune.” But which CEO? The original says Dell CEO, which is Michael Dell. But does the user know that? Maybe using Jack Dorsey is a red herring because he isn’t Bitcoin’s creator. Wait, the original title says Bitcoin’s creator, which is Satoshi Nakamoto. So “Satoshi Nakamoto” might not be known, but maybe “Bitcoin Creator’s” identity is still a keyword. So “Unknown Bitcoin Creator” could be better for SEO. Combine that with the wealth comparison. “Richer Than Dell CEO” is key, but also “Wealth Surpasses” or “Net Worth Exceeds.” Maybe “Bitcoin Creator’s Net Worth Surpasses Dell CEO’s” but include a clickbait word like “Mysterious” or “Unknown.” Also, the title should be short but impactful. Maybe start with “Mysterious Bitcoin Creator Now Wealthier Than Dell CEO” then add a colon and something about the hidden identity. “But Their Identity Remains Unknown” or “Despite Never Being Seen Publicly.” Check for keyword stuffing. “Bitcoin creator richer than Dell CEO” is a possible search query. So maybe “Bitcoin Creator Now Richer Than Dell CEO – But Identity Still Unknown” but needs to be snappier. Alternatively, “Bitcoin’s Creator Surpasses Dell CEO in Wealth Despite Remaining Hidden” Wait, the user specified “Only return title in short” so keep it concise. Possible title: “Bitcoin’s Mysterious Creator Wealthier Than Dell CEO Despite Never Being Seen Publicly” – maybe a bit long. Alternatively, “Bitcoin’s Creator Now Richer Than Dell CEO – But Nobody Knows Their Face” but “face” might not be the best keyword. Optimize for “Bitcoin creator richer than Dell CEO” and “Unknown.” Maybe “Bitcoin Creator’s Net Worth Tops Dell CEO’s, Yet Identity Remains a Mystery” – shorter? “Bitcoin Creator Richer Than Dell CEO, Still Unknown in Public” – maybe better. Check character count. News titles are usually around 50-60 characters. Let me count: “Bitcoin’s Mysterious Creator Now Wealthier Than Dell CEO” is 46 characters, but maybe missing the SEO part. Including “Despite Never Being Seen Publicly” adds more. Maybe shorten to “Bitcoin Creator Richer Than Dell CEO but Still Never Seen Publicly.” Alternatively, “Bitcoin’s Creator Surpasses Dell CEO in Wealth: Identity Unknown” – that’s concise, uses a colon, includes keywords. Maybe that’s better. Let me verify if “Satoshi Nakamoto” is known enough. Since the original didn’t use that name, perhaps sticking with “Bitcoin Creator” is better. Also, using “Wealth” and “Net Worth” can be part of SEO. Final thought: Use “Bitcoin Creator’s Net Worth Exceeds Dell CEO’s – Still No Public Sightings” but maybe too long. Alternatively, “Bitcoin Creator Now Richer Than Dell CEO Yet Remains Unseen” – concise and includes key points. Yeah, that might work. Let’s go with that. Bitcoin Creator’s Net Worth Surpasses Dell CEO’s, Yet Identity Remains Unknown

Satoshi Nakamoto Surpasses Michael Dell, Ranked 11th Richest Person Globally with $128.92 Billion Bitcoin Fortune The Prime News Network Analyzes…

1 Min Read
Top Story

Alright, the user wants me to rewrite their title in a “News Style & SEO Focused” way. The original title is “Fee Deposit and Verification for JEECUP Phase-III Allotments Begins July 22”. Let me first understand what News Style usually entails. News titles are typically concise, start with the most important info like the date or event, and use active verbs. For SEO, keywords are crucial—probably JEECUP, Phase-III, Fee Deposit, Verification, Allotments, and the date. The given date is July 22, which should come early in the title. The current title starts with “Fee Deposit and Verification”, followed by the event and the date. To make it more news-style, maybe invert the structure to start with the date and the action happening. Words like “Starts” instead of “Begins” could be slightly more active. Also, using “Phase 3” instead of “Phase-III” might be better for SEO since numerals are often preferred in titles for quick reading. I should check if “JEECUP Phase 3 Allottments” is a common term. The user might have meant “allotments” correctly. Maybe “Begins on July 22” is better phrased as “Set to Start July 22” for variety. Let me structure it as “JEECUP Phase 3 Allotments: Fee Deposit & Verification Process Set to Start July 22 | Latest Updates”. That includes keywords upfront, uses a colon for emphasis, and adds a SEO-friendly descriptor with “Latest Updates”. But wait, the user said “short” in the original request. Maybe the part after the pipe is too long. Perhaps condense it to “JEECUP Phase 3 Allotments Fee Deposit & Verification Begin July 22, 2025”. Since the current date is 2025-07-21, including the year might be necessary for accuracy. Also, using “Begin” instead of “Starts” could be more concise. Checking character count to ensure it’s within typical SEO limits. Keeping it under 60 characters might be tight, but including all keywords is important. Maybe “JEECUP Phase 3: Fee Deposit & Verification for Allotments Begin July 22” is shorter. That way, the key terms are included, the date is highlighted, and it’s structured like a news headline with a subheadline after the colon. JEECUP Phase 3: Fee Deposit & Verification for Allotments Begin July 22 – Critical Deadline Alert

Lucknow News: JEECUP Announces Phase III Seat Allotment Dates for 2025 AdmissionsLucknow – Prime News Network: The Uttar Pradesh Joint…

2 Min Read
The Prime News Network

News

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright Policy

Country

  • Innovate
  • Gadget
  • PC hardware
  • Review
  • Software

Culture

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos

© The Prime News Network. Developed By TurtleSoft Solution. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?