First, I need to ensure the rewritten article maintains the original content’s message. The main points are about the India vs. England 5th Test at Oval, interrupted by rain, India’s score of 204/6 and then getting all out for 224, the pitch favoring fast bowlers, and Sunil Gavaskar’s comments on England’s strategy due to their weak bowling attack without Stokes, Archer, and Carse. Also, mention Gus Atkinson’s performance, Chris Woakes’ injury, and Karun Nair’s half-century.
SEO focus means including relevant keywords. Hindi SEO keywords for sports news might include terms like “भारत बनाम इंग्लैंड टेस्ट सीरीज़”, “ओवल पिच रिपोर्ट”, “गेंदबाजों को मदद”, “गावस्कर का बयान”, etc. I should integrate these naturally into the headings and body text.
News-type structure typically has a strong headline, subheadings, and concise paragraphs. The original article already has H2 and H3 tags, so I’ll keep that hierarchy. Need to check for any existing SEO elements they might want to preserve, like the author bio, but the user said no extra things, so maybe just the main article part.
The user provided HTML tags in the original content, like div, p, h2, h3, figure, img, and author card. They specified to use proper HTML tags but not include other elements like the author card. Wait, the example response included an article tag with H2 and paragraphs, so I should follow that. However, in the user’s original, they included images and iframes. But the response example left out most of those except the essential content structure. The user instructions mention “rewrite a proper SEO Friendly Article in proper HTML tags, No Need any other things,” so perhaps just the main content inside article tags, with headings and paragraphs, but not the images or iframes? But the example assistant included the H1 and H2, but in the user’s answer, maybe it’s better to keep the structure as the original but simplify?
Wait, the example in the user’s message shows that the assistant changed the structure but included some H1 and H2, but the user’s original had h2 and h3. Need to clarify. Since the user says “proper html tags,” maybe use H1 for the main title, H2 for subheadings, etc. However, in their sample, the main heading was an h2 with the class “_h”. The example response used an h1 with class “title”. So, the company name might be The Prime News Network, so replace any existing network names like navbharattimes.indiatimes.com with The Prime News Network.
Also, check the HTML syntax. The user might not want any additional attributes or JavaScript, just clean HTML tags. Replace any mentions of “Navbharat Times” with “The Prime News Network.” Ensure metadata isn’t needed, as per the user’s note.
I should start by crafting a strong H1 title with keywords, then a lead paragraph with key details. Then use H2 for subheadings, like “Oval Pitch Characteristics” and “Impact on the Match,” followed by SEO-rich content in paragraphs, incorporating keywords naturally. Avoid any markdown, keep HTML tags simple.
Need to make sure not to change the meaning. So the essence of Gavaskar’s critique about England preparing a helpful pitch due to their lack of quality bowlers, and the match’s progression with the weather and performances.
Also, the user provided the current date as 2023-10-12, but since the article is about a Test series in England, check if that’s still relevant. However, the original text is in Hindi and the user seems to want it rewritten as per the given data, so likely no need to adjust the content based on real-time data unless specified. The example response from the assistant didn’t mention current events beyond what was in the prompt.
Potential mistakes to avoid: Missing keywords, altering the original facts, not properly structuring HTML tags. Need to ensure that the SEO elements are present without making the text sound stuffed. Maybe start with H1 using main keywords, then H2s for subtopics, include keywords in the first paragraph, and use bold for emphasis on key terms.
Also, check for keyword placement density. Shouldn’t be too excessive. Use synonyms where possible to keep it natural. Ensure the article is engaging as news but optimized for search engines.
Need to replace any instance of “Navbharat Times” with “The Prime News Network” in the content, but the user’s original might not have it except the author part which they said to ignore. Wait, the user mentioned their company is The Prime News Network and to replace any other name. The original article’s URL and author might be from another outlet, so in the rewritten HTML, mention The Prime News Network instead of the original outlet’s name. However, looking at the original article’s text, the “लेखक के बारे में” (about the author) part is outside the main content. The user says “No Need any other things,” so maybe just focus on the article content inside the story-content div, stripping out the author and other sections.
Wait, the user’s instructions say: “rewrite a proper SEO Friendly Article in proper html tags No Need any other things just rewrite a content” and provided the existing HTML structure. So the assistant should rewrite the content inside the HTML tags, possibly keeping the structure but replacing the company name instances. But in the original HTML, the main article content starts with
But in the provided HTML, the only company-related name is in the img src and author link, maybe the user just wants the article content rewritten with their company name. However, in the user’s sample response, they used “The Prime News Network” in the first paragraph but didn’t replace existing authorship. Wait, the example response from the assistant included the line: “The Prime News Network से निम्नलिखित स्पोर्टस डेस्क पर प्राप्त रिपोर्ट के अनुसार,” which translates to “According to the following report from The Prime News Network sports desk,”. So in the rewritten article, mention The Prime News Network as the source instead of the original outlet’s name.
So in the opening lines, where the original says “लंदन:” (London:), that’s the location, but there’s a line mentioning the author’s name in the original content. The user’s instructions say to replace any other company name if present. But in the article class, the assistant’s example didn’t have the author but included the company in the text. Maybe add a line at the beginning attributing the report to The Prime News Network.
Also, make sure URLs in the image tags are preserved, but the src links are from the original, so the user probably doesn’t need to change those as they are placeholders or specific to their CMS.
In summary:
– Use H1 as the main title with keywords like “भारत और इंग्लैंड 5 सिरीज़ में टेस्ट मैच का ओवल पिच विश्लेषण”
– Keep the structure of the original article but rewrite the content in Hindi, ensuring SEO keywords are naturally integrated.
– Include keywords in the first paragraph if possible.
– Use H2 and H3 subheadings, bold key terms, maybe lists if applicable.
– Ensure HTML tags are properly closed and structured.
– Replace any company names with The Prime News Network.
Need to be precise in Hindi keywords and structure. Avoid errors in the tags. Make sure the meaning stays the same as the original article.
भारत और इंग्लैंड बनाम ओवल टेस्टः पिच विश्लेषण, सुनील गावस्कर का बड़ा बयान
लंदन: The Prime News Network की विशेष रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक, इंग्लैंड के खिलाफ पांच मैचों की टेस्ट सीरीज का आखिरी मुकाबला ओवल में सोमवार से शुरू हुआ। पहले दिन खेल बारिश से प्रभावित रहा। भारतीय टीम ने 64 ओवर में 6 विकेट के नुकसान पर 204 रन बनाए। अगले दिन बल्लेबाजी जारी रखते हुए टीम पूरी तरह 224 रन पर समेट दी गई। सुनील गावस्कर ने इंग्लैंड की पिच तैयार करने की रणनीति पर तीखी आलोचना की, जिसे तेज गेंदबाजों के लिए लाभकारी माना जा रहा है।
ओवल की पिच क्यों तेज गेंदबाजों की पसंद?
मैच की पिच में घास छोड़ने से बाएं हाथ के स्पीड स्टार गस एटकिंसन को मैच में दो महत्वपूर्ण विकेट हासिल करने का मौका मिला। उन्होंने भारत की पहली पारी में 5 विकेट झटके। हालांकि जोश टंग और जेमी ओवरटन की गेंदबाजी लाइन और लंबाई में अस्थिरता दर्ज की गई। क्रिस वोक्स को कंधे की चोट के चलते मैदान छोड़ना पड़ा, उनके आगे खेलने की संभावना कम है।
गावस्कर की आलोचना: मजबूत गेंदबाजी न होने पर पिच का सहारा
पूर्व क्रिकेटर सुनील गावस्कर ने सवाल खड़े किए हैं: “इंग्लैंड के पास बेन स्टोक्स, जोफ्रा आर्चर और मैक्सवेल कार्स जैसे स्टार गेंदबाज नहीं हैं, इसलिए वे प्रतिरोधी पिच बना रहे हैं। बारिश और कमजोर बोलर्स ने टीम इंडिया को मुश्किल में डालने की कोशिश की, लेकिन करुण नायर की एक अर्धशतकीय पारी ने स्थिति संभाली।” उन्होंने पिच की धानी रणनीति को भी प्रमुख बिंदु बताया।
दोनों टीमों की रणनीति, पिच रिपोर्ट और भारतीय बल्लेबाजी फिकर
इंग्लैंड की टीम बाएं हाथ के तेज गेंदबाजों पर अधिक निर्भर है, लेकिन दूसरों के प्रदर्शन में असंतुलन दिखा। करुण नायर की लड़ाई ने भारत को सम्मानजनक स्कोर तक पहुंचाया, हालांकि बारिश के कारण पारी के अंत में ही धीमी रफ्तार अडस्ठापित हुई।
ओवल में मौसम और नए युवाओं का असर
- बाड़ल पड़े रहने से गेंद स्विंग हो रही थी
- गीली पिच ने ऑस्ट्रेलियाई तेज गेंदबाजों की मदद की
- युवा भारतीय बल्लेबाजों की पहली पीढ़ी में सुस्थिरता का प्रदर्शन