Sign In
  • INDIA
  • GUJARAT
The Prime News Network
  • Home
  • Top Story
  • Science
  • Politics
  • Market
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Jobbs
  • Search
Reading: Rohit Sharma’s Reaction After DRS Overturns ‘Out’ Call Goes Viral | Cricket News – The Times of India
Share
The Prime News NetworkThe Prime News Network
Font ResizerAa
Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.

Home » Rohit Sharma’s Reaction After DRS Overturns ‘Out’ Call Goes Viral | Cricket News – The Times of India

Top Story

Rohit Sharma’s Reaction After DRS Overturns ‘Out’ Call Goes Viral | Cricket News – The Times of India

THE PRIME NEWS NETWORK
Last updated: May 1, 2025 3:21 pm
THE PRIME NEWS NETWORK
Share
Rohit Sharma's Reaction After DRS Overturns 'Out' Call Goes Viral | Cricket News - The Times of India
SHARE

Rohit Sharma's reaction goes viral after DRS overturns 'out' call

NEW DELHI: Rohit Sharma lit up the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur — not just with his bat, but with his reaction — after a dramatic moment during the Mumbai Indians vs Rajasthan Royals IPL 2025 clash on Thursday.

In the second over of the match, Rohit was given out LBW off Fazalhaq Farooqi, only for the Decision Review System (DRS) to flip the script at the very last second.

The incident happened on the fifth ball of the second over.

Farooqi bowled a slower one that drifted into the pads. Rohit, completely outfoxed by the pace, missed his shot and was hit on the back leg.

It looked plumb in real time, and the umpire raised his finger immediately. Rohit looked uncertain but decided to review the decision with just a second left on the DRS timer.

To everyone’s surprise, the ball-tracking replay showed the delivery pitched just outside the leg stump.

The decision was reversed, and Rohit burst into laughter — his reaction perfectly captured by cameras and quickly going viral on social media.

It was a moment of comic relief in a high-stakes game, and fans couldn’t get enough of it.

At the toss earlier, Rajasthan Royals’ stand-in skipper Riyan Parag had opted to bowl first, citing potential dew later in the evening.

Meanwhile, Mumbai Indians captain Hardik Pandya said he would’ve bowled first too but remained confident in his side’s approach and form.

Mumbai came into the match riding high with five consecutive wins and sitting third on the table, while RR struggled in eighth place with only three wins from ten games.

In a tournament filled with intensity, it’s these little moments, like Rohit’s laugh, that bring joy to cricket lovers everywhere.

Reference : https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/ipl/top-stories/rohit-sharmas-reaction-goes-viral-after-drs-overturns-out-call/articleshow/120797857.cms

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Share This Article
Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article NDA Government Allegedly Uses SIT as Political Tool in Liquor Case, YSRCP Leader Charges IIA Researchers Unveil Insights into the Sun’s Subsurface Weather
Next Article NDA Government Allegedly Uses SIT as Political Tool in Liquor Case, YSRCP Leader Charges New EV Charger Unit Opens in Hyderabad
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

Berkshire Hathaway Board Approves Greg Abel as CEO, Warren Buffett Endorses Him
Top Story

Berkshire Hathaway Board Approves Greg Abel as CEO, Warren Buffett Endorses Him

Berkshire Hathaway Names Greg Abel as New CEO Berkshire Hathaway’s board of directors has formally approved Greg Abel as the…

3 Min Read
NHRC Issues Warning to Karnataka Government, DGP Over Hubballi Minor Rape, Death of Accused in Police Encounter
Top Story

NHRC Issues Warning to Karnataka Government, DGP Over Hubballi Minor Rape, Death of Accused in Police Encounter

Police personnel at the crime scene where a man who allegedly murdered a five-year-old girl was killed in police firing…

2 Min Read
Top Story

We are rewriting the title to be in “News Style” and “SEO Focused”, and we are to return only the title in short. Original title: “Stocks To Buy: CLSA projects 37% upside on this PSU power stock” Requirements: – News Style: This typically means using strong, active verbs, making it sound like breaking news, and having a sense of urgency or importance. – SEO Focused: We want to include keywords that people might search for, such as “stocks to buy”, “PSU power stock”, the name of the stock (but note the original doesn’t have the stock name, so we can’t add it if we don’t know it), “CLSA”, “37% upside”, etc. However, note that the original title does not specify the stock name. Since we don’t have the stock name, we must keep it generic? But in the original, it says “this PSU power stock”, so in news style we might want to be more specific but we don’t have the name. But wait, the instruction says: “Only return title in short”. So we are to output a short title. We are to avoid adding extra information? But we don’t know the stock name. So we have to keep it as is? However, in news style, they often tease the stock name (like “This PSU Giant” or “NTPC?”) but without knowing we can’t. Alternatively, in financial news, they often replace the stock name with a descriptor to create curiosity. But since we don’t have the name, we have to use a descriptor. But note: the original says “this PSU power stock”, so we can use that. SEO: We want to include: – “Stocks to buy” – “CLSA” – “37% upside” – “PSU power stock” News style: Make it punchy. Possible rewrites: Option 1: “CLSA Forecasts 37% Surge for This PSU Power Stock: Top Buy Now” But we have to be short. Another: “Exclusive: CLSA Predicts 37% Rise in Key PSU Power Stock” But the original says “projects”, so we can use “Forecasts”, “Predicts”, etc. We are constrained by the need to be short. Let me try: “CLSA: 37% Upside Seen for Undervalued PSU Power Stock” But the original is about “Stocks To Buy”, so we want to include the call to action (buy). Another: “Buy Alert: CLSA Flags 37% Growth Potential in PSU Power Stock” But note: we must keep it very short. The instruction says “in short”, so we need a concise title. Common news style titles are often under 70 characters for SEO. Let me count the original: “Stocks To Buy: CLSA projects 37% upside on this PSU power stock” -> 58 characters. We want to be similar or shorter. We can try: “CLSA: 37% Upside for This PSU Power Stock – Buy Now” But let’s see: – “CLSA” is a key term for SEO. – “37% upside” is important. – “PSU power stock” is the subject. – We want to include a call to action? The original has “Stocks To Buy”, so we should have a similar call. Another common pattern: “Why [Stock] is a Buy: [Broker] Projects [X]% Upside” But we don’t have the stock name. So: “Why This PSU Power Stock is a Buy: CLSA Sees 37% Upside” That is 57 characters. We can also do: “Top Buy: CLSA Predicts 37% Jump in PSU Power Stock” But note: the original says “PSU power stock”, which is a specific type (Public Sector Undertaking in India). We must keep “PSU” because it’s a keyword. Let me check: Option: “CLSA Targets 37% Gain on Undervalued PSU Power Stock – Buy Signal” But we want short. I think the best is to be direct and punchy. News outlets often use: “Broker [Name] Upgrades [Stock] to Buy with [X]% Upside” But we don’t have the upgrade, just a projection. Another: “Exclusive: CLSA Forecasts 37% Rise for Key PSU Power Stock” But we don’t have “exclusive” in the original. We are to rewrite based on the given info. Let me look at current financial news titles for inspiration: – “Stocks to Buy: Morgan Stanley Picks These 5 Growth Stocks” – “NTPC: CLSA Raises Target, Sees 37% Upside” But we don’t have the stock name. Since we don’t have the stock name, we must use a descriptor. Given the constraints, I think: “CLSA: 37% Upside for This PSU Power Stock – Top Buy” But we can make it even shorter by removing redundancy. How about: “Buy Alert: CLSA Flags 37% Upside in PSU Power Stock” That is 49 characters. Another: “CLSA Projects 37% Surge in PSU Power Stock – Buy Now” 51 characters. We are to return only the title, so no extra text. The instruction says: “Only return title in short” So we output just the string. I think the following meets the criteria: “CLSA: 37% Upside Seen for PSU Power Stock – Buy Now” But let’s make sure it’s news style and SEO. – It starts with “CLSA” which is a keyword and a proper noun (brokerage) so it stands out. – “37% Upside” is a key phrase. – “PSU Power Stock” is the main subject. – “Buy Now” is a strong call to action. It’s short: 48 characters. Alternatively, we can use the exact words from the original but make it more news-like. Original: “Stocks To Buy: CLSA projects 37% upside on this PSU power stock” We can flip it to: “This PSU Power Stock to Soar 37%: CLSA’s Top Buy Pick” But that is 52 characters. I think the most effective for SEO and news style is to have the numbers and the action verb. Final decision: “CLSA Targets 37% Gain for PSU Power Stock – Buy Now” But note: the original says “projects”, which is similar to “targets” (as in target price). Yes. However, in financial context, “targets” is commonly used for the target price. So “CLSA Targets 37% Upside on PSU Power Stock – Buy Now” But “on” vs “for”? Both are used. I think “for” is more natural. But let’s see: “CLSA targets 37% upside for [stock]” Yes. We are to return only the title, so: CLSA Targets 37% Upside for PSU Power Stock – Buy Now But wait, the instruction says “in short”, so we want it concise. Maybe we can remove “Now”? “CLSA Targets 37% Upside for PSU Power Stock – Top Buy” That is 52 characters. Another common format: “Why [X] is a Buy: …” But without the stock name, it’s “Why This PSU Power Stock is a Buy: CLSA Sees 37% Upside” (57 characters) which is a bit long. We are to be short, so the first one is better. I think the best is: “Buy This PSU Power Stock: CLSA Sees 37% Upside” That is 47 characters. It starts with the call to action, which is strong. And it’s clear. Let me check SEO: – Starts with “Buy”, which is a keyword for investors. – Then “PSU Power Stock” and “CLSA” and “37% Upside”. Yes. News style: They often start with the imperative. Example: “Buy Apple Stock: Analysts Predict 20% Rise” So this is good. We’ll go with: “Buy This PSU Power Stock: CLSA Sees 37% Upside” But note: the stock is not named, so “This” is okay for the context of the article (like in the headline of the article, it would be referring to the stock they are about to name). In the actual article, they will name the stock, so the headline can say “this”. Yes. So the rewritten title: “Buy This PSU Power Stock: CLSA Sees 37% Upside” But the instruction says “in short”, and this is short. We can also drop “This” to make it: “Buy PSU Power Stock: CLSA Sees 37% Upside” But then it’s a bit generic (as if all PSU power stocks). The original says “this”, meaning a specific one. But in the headline, they often use “this” to create immediacy. However, for SEO, repeating “PSU Power Stock” without specification might be okay because the article is about one. But to be safe, we keep “This”. Final title: “Buy This PSU Power Stock: CLSA Sees 37% Upside” Buy This PSU Power Stock: CLSA Forecasts 37% Upside

Okay, let me approach this systematically. The user wants an SEO-focused news article rewrite for Prime News Network, replacing any…

5 Min Read

Access Denied: Uncommon Event Hits Homepage

Oops! Looks like we've run into a problem here. Our server cannot allow you to access the page at .…

1 Min Read
The Prime News Network

News

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright Policy

Country

  • Innovate
  • Gadget
  • PC hardware
  • Review
  • Software

Culture

  • Stars
  • Screen
  • Culture
  • Media
  • Videos

© The Prime News Network. Developed By TurtleSoft Solution. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?